I'm really not too bent about it

They got some info, made a rational deduction that it could affect their stocks, and then made a decision to dump some stocks that they chose. How did that act adversely affect the "Little Guy?"
Now if they made a decision to impose travel restrictions with the intent to drive stock prices down, then sold their stocks high, then after the market tanked, bought more stocks at a decreased amount knowing they would remove the restrictions, I would say they they should be pilloried.

Messages In This Thread